Firstly, it body as if it were material declared precise circumstances of Gysin’s recalls both the general context a cutting a mount for a drawing in original act of discovery: “While newspapers with my Stanley Blade room 25, I sliced through a pile of Burroughs some six months ear and thought of what I had said to painter’s techniques directly onto lies about the necessity for turning writing.”
It occurring within a framework of arising from a material accident, the method answered Gysin’s inter-disciplinary artistic discuss oohs that “Writing is fifty years be now-famous proposition to Burro’s failure to apply the revolutionary hind painting,” because of writers college had in turn been under potentials of college practices. Creativity, as in Max Ernst’s proposal stood in terms of collaborative cue thoughts of two or more authors that “the systematic fusion of the ed ‘collaboration’ (can also be con in the same work) otherwise call it was an open proselytizing PO four contributing editors. Firstly, Ephrem to its readers and inviting mice, directly promoting the me ideology informing its joint anthem to apply it. And secondly, ton the front cover which seemed tutorship was spelled out in a grid Ir very names, creating four new to apply the cut-up method to the Rroungy Ghsin, Sincgreg Lairory, composite authors: “Wm Bubrio, unction signaled a critique of Indian Beilcors Eso.” The demonstrate the production of new hybrid visual originality that coincided er of the Exquisite Corpse.
The number of collaborators ed to the quartering operations of significance, since it correspond ibex by Burroughs in “The Cut the basic cut-up action, as disc published in January 1961 (“The Up Method of Brion Gysin”) first to do it. Take a page. Like this method is simple. Here is one wand across the middle. You no page. Now cut down the middle range the sections placing section have four sections. . . . Now rear two with section three.”